Motorola Signature vs Oppo Reno16 5G
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Motorola Signature 64/100, Oppo Reno16 5G 64/100.
| Motorola Signature | Oppo Reno16 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Durability score | 64/100 | 64/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 52 h | 63.2 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,200 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 5,820 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | B | A |
| Repairability index | 3.61/5 | 3.52/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 6 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 90 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | signature (XT2603-2) | CPH2865 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.