Motorola Razr fold vs realme C01
On the EU energy label the realme C01 comes out ahead in 3 of the 5 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Motorola Razr fold 67/100, realme C01 66/100.
| Motorola Razr fold | realme C01 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Durability score | 67/100 | 66/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 59.3 h | 70.4 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,200 charge cycles | 1,300 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,760 mAh | 5,880 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 95 | 300 |
| Drop reliability class | C | A |
| Repairability index | 3.62/5 | 3.18/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 7 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP48 | IP64 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | No |
| Charging power | 90 W | 5 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | razr fold (XT2651-1) | RMX5399 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.