Motorola Razr 60 (XT2553-1) vs Oukitel C57 Pro (2026 registration)
On the EU energy label the Motorola Razr 60 (XT2553-1) comes out ahead in 3 of the 4 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Motorola Razr 60 (XT2553-1) 50/100, Oukitel C57 Pro (2026 registration) 50/100.
| Motorola Razr 60 (XT2553-1) | Oukitel C57 Pro (2026 registration) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | B |
| Durability score | 50/100 | 50/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 45.1 h | 41.6 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 4,274 mAh | 4,300 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 70 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | C | A |
| Repairability index | 3.63/5 | 3.57/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 6 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP48 | IP54 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | No |
| Charging power | 30 W | 5 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | razr 60 (XT2553-1) | C57 Pro |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.