Motorola Edge 60 neo vs TCL P80 Ultra
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 1 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Motorola Edge 60 neo 64/100, TCL P80 Ultra 64/100.
| Motorola Edge 60 neo | TCL P80 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Durability score | 64/100 | 64/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 54.5 h | 69 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 4,850 mAh | 5,600 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | B | B |
| Repairability index | 4.04/5 | 3.55/5 |
| Repairability class | A | B |
| OS updates for at least | 7 years | 7 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 7 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 68 W | 45 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | edge 60 neo (XT2509-1) | T952K |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.