Mitsubishi Electric PEAD-M60JA2 / PUHZ-ZRP60VHA2 vs Panasonic CS-E9PD3EA / CU-E9PD3EA
The Panasonic CS-E9PD3EA / CU-E9PD3EA uses 189 kWh less a year, about €54 a year at the EU average price.
| Mitsubishi Electric PEAD-M60JA2 / PUHZ-ZRP60VHA2 | Panasonic CS-E9PD3EA / CU-E9PD3EA | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A++ | A+ |
| Annual consumption | 340 kWh | 151 kWh |
| Running cost (EU avg.) | €96/year | €43/year |
| Function | cooling and heating | cooling and heating |
| Cooling capacity | 6.1 kW | 5.8 kW |
| Heating capacity | 4.4 kW | 4.2 kW |
| SEER (cooling) | 6.2 | 2.5 |
| SCOP (heating, average climate) | 4.1 | 2.6 |
| Annual cooling consumption | 340 kWh | 151 kWh |
| Annual heating consumption (average climate) | 1,487 kWh | 857 kWh |
| Heating class | AP | AP |
| Indoor noise | 56 dB(A) | 61 dB(A) |
| Outdoor noise | 67 dB(A) | 61 dB(A) |
| Refrigerant | R410A | R410A |
| Refrigerant GWP | 1,975 | 2,088 |
| Model numbers | PEAD-M60JA2 / PUHZ-ZRP60VHA2, PEAD-M60JAL2 / PUHZ-ZRP60VHA2, PEAD-M60JA2-ET / PUHZ-ZRP60VHA2 | CS-E9PD3EA / CU-E9PD3EA |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.