LAGENIO A12 vs Motorola G37
On the EU energy label the Motorola G37 comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: LAGENIO A12 61/100, Motorola G37 61/100.
| LAGENIO A12 | Motorola G37 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Durability score | 61/100 | 61/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 63.4 h | 63.9 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 6,500 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | A | A |
| Repairability index | 3.66/5 | 3.39/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP54 | IP64 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 20 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | A12 | g37 (XT2625-4) |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.