Kruger Matz EAGLE 1077 vs REDMI Pad 2 9.7
On the EU energy label the REDMI Pad 2 9.7 comes out ahead in 3 of the 5 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Kruger Matz EAGLE 1077 54/100, REDMI Pad 2 9.7 53/100.
| Kruger Matz EAGLE 1077 | REDMI Pad 2 9.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | E | E |
| Durability score | 54/100 | 53/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 82.3 h | 108 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 7,450 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 52 | 104 |
| Drop reliability class | E | C |
| Repairability index | 3.4/5 | 2.74/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 6 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP42 | IP52 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | KM1077 | 2603ARP14G |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.