IsEasy TDJR09A vs Puluomis ZMW-DUHC02
The IsEasy TDJR09A uses 31 kWh less a year, about €9 a year at the EU average price.
| IsEasy TDJR09A | Puluomis ZMW-DUHC02 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | D |
| Annual consumption | 67.2 kWh | 98 kWh |
| Running cost (EU avg.) | €19/year | €28/year |
| Capacity | 3 place settings | 3 place settings |
| Energy per 100 cycles | 24 kWh | 35 kWh |
| Water per cycle | 4.7 L | 4.6 L |
| Noise | 52 dB(A) | 61 dB(A) |
| Noise class | B | D |
| Eco programme | 167 min | 154 min |
| Installation | free standing | free standing |
| Height | 46 cm | 37 cm |
| Width | 43 cm | 51 cm |
| Depth | 43 cm | 45 cm |
| Model numbers | TDJR09A, TDQR09A | ZMW-DUHC02 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.