IIIF150 B3 vs REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5G
On the EU energy label the REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5G comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: IIIF150 B3 47/100, REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5G 48/100.
| IIIF150 B3 | REDMI Note 17 Pro Max 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | E | B |
| Durability score | 47/100 | 48/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 64.7 h | 79.3 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 10,800 mAh | 9,010 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | A | A |
| Repairability index | 3.39/5 | 2.63/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 30 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | B3 | 2609FRA74G |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.