Hotwav A36 (A56) vs POCO X8 Pro Max
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Hotwav A36 (A56) 41/100, POCO X8 Pro Max 41/100.
| Hotwav A36 (A56) | POCO X8 Pro Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | D | B |
| Durability score | 41/100 | 41/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 37.4 h | 80.2 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 8,330 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | B | B |
| Repairability index | 3.44/5 | 2.63/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 6 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP44 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | A56 | 2602BPC18G |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.