HONOR Magic V6 vs POCO C81 Pro
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: HONOR Magic V6 47/100, POCO C81 Pro 46/100.
| HONOR Magic V6 | POCO C81 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | A |
| Durability score | 47/100 | 46/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 57.7 h | 67.3 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,200 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 6,510 mAh | 5,880 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 210 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | A | A |
| Repairability index | 3.01/5 | 2.63/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 5 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | PNM-N49 | 25128PC17Y |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.