Doogee F10S vs Oukitel C57 Pro (2026 registration)
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 1 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Doogee F10S 50/100, Oukitel C57 Pro (2026 registration) 50/100.
| Doogee F10S | Oukitel C57 Pro (2026 registration) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | B |
| Durability score | 50/100 | 50/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 50.8 h | 41.6 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,150 mAh | 4,300 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | A | A |
| Repairability index | 3.4/5 | 3.57/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 5 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | Blade10 Pro | C57 Pro |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.