Daewoo WM-FC9614W0A-ES vs Whirlpool WPM 912W ADS BE
The Whirlpool WPM 912W ADS BE uses 42 kWh less a year, about €12 a year at the EU average price.
| Daewoo WM-FC9614W0A-ES | Whirlpool WPM 912W ADS BE | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Annual consumption | 85.8 kWh | 44 kWh |
| Running cost (EU avg.) | €24/year | €12/year |
| Capacity | 9 kg | 9 kg |
| Energy per 100 cycles | 39 kWh | 20 kWh |
| Water per cycle | 36 L | 49 L |
| Spin noise | 75 dB(A) | 72 dB(A) |
| Noise class | B | A |
| Max. spin speed | 1,330 rpm | 1,351 rpm |
| Spin-drying class | B | B |
| Eco 40-60 programme | 228 min | 228 min |
| Remaining moisture | 53.4% | 53.9% |
| Height | 85 cm | 85 cm |
| Width | 60 cm | 60 cm |
| Depth | 58 cm | 58 cm |
| Model numbers | WM-FC9614W0A-ES, WM-WFC9614W0A-ES, WM-WFC9614S0A-ES | WPM 912W ADS BE, WPM 912W ADS IT, WPM 912G ADS IT |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.