Daewoo WM-FC1674W1A-DE vs Samsung WF90H11C4S
The Samsung WF90H11C4S uses 42 kWh less a year, about €12 a year at the EU average price.
| Daewoo WM-FC1674W1A-DE | Samsung WF90H11C4S | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Annual consumption | 105.6 kWh | 63.8 kWh |
| Running cost (EU avg.) | €30/year | €18/year |
| Capacity | 11 kg | 11 kg |
| Energy per 100 cycles | 48 kWh | 29 kWh |
| Water per cycle | 50 L | 54 L |
| Spin noise | 76 dB(A) | 72 dB(A) |
| Noise class | B | A |
| Max. spin speed | 1,330 rpm | 1,400 rpm |
| Spin-drying class | B | B |
| Eco 40-60 programme | 240 min | 240 min |
| Remaining moisture | 53.4% | 53.9% |
| Height | 85 cm | 85 cm |
| Width | 60 cm | 60 cm |
| Depth | 56 cm | 59 cm |
| Model numbers | WM-FC1674W1A-DE | WF90H11C4S, WF90H11C4W |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.