Cyrus CM450XA vs Xgody X36
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Cyrus CM450XA 32/100, Xgody X36 32/100.
| Cyrus CM450XA | Xgody X36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | B |
| Durability score | 32/100 | 32/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 59.8 h | 39.3 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 900 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 3,800 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 45 |
| Drop reliability class | B | D |
| Repairability index | 3.08/5 | 3.59/5 |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP44 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | — |
| Model numbers | CM450XA | X36 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.