Cubot KINGKONG POWER 5 vs Motorola G77
On the EU energy label the Cubot KINGKONG POWER 5 comes out ahead in 3 of the 5 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Cubot KINGKONG POWER 5 74/100, Motorola G77 73/100.
| Cubot KINGKONG POWER 5 | Motorola G77 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | A |
| Durability score | 74/100 | 73/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 148.1 h | 60.9 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,400 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 15,300 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | A | B |
| Repairability index | 3.13/5 | 4.09/5 |
| Repairability class | C | A |
| OS updates for at least | 6 years | 7 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | KINGKONG POWER 5 | g77 (XT2621-4) |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.