Cubot KINGKING ACE 5 vs Hotwav A16 Pro Max (A17 Pro Max)
On the EU energy label the Cubot KINGKING ACE 5 comes out ahead in 3 of the 4 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Cubot KINGKING ACE 5 56/100, Hotwav A16 Pro Max (A17 Pro Max) 41/100.
| Cubot KINGKING ACE 5 | Hotwav A16 Pro Max (A17 Pro Max) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | D |
| Durability score | 56/100 | 41/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 99.1 h | 36.8 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 800 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 10,200 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | B | B |
| Repairability index | 3.54/5 | 3.44/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 6 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP44 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 6 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 33 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | KINGKONG ACE 5 | A17 Pro Max |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.