Cubot KINGKING ACE 5 vs Google Pixel 11
On the EU energy label the Google Pixel 11 comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Cubot KINGKING ACE 5 56/100, Google Pixel 11 56/100.
| Cubot KINGKING ACE 5 | Google Pixel 11 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | B |
| Durability score | 56/100 | 56/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 99.1 h | 48.8 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 10,200 mAh | 4,840 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | B | A |
| Repairability index | 3.54/5 | 3.79/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 33 W | 7 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | KINGKONG ACE 5 | GUJ0N |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.