CEPTER CGWT16207P (CTITANULTRAX) (EPREL 2454254) vs Hotwav Pad 13 Pro
On the EU energy label the CEPTER CGWT16207P (CTITANULTRAX) (EPREL 2454254) comes out ahead in 3 of the 5 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: CEPTER CGWT16207P (CTITANULTRAX) (EPREL 2454254) 64/100, Hotwav Pad 13 Pro 64/100.
| CEPTER CGWT16207P (CTITANULTRAX) (EPREL 2454254) | Hotwav Pad 13 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | E | D |
| Durability score | 64/100 | 64/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 118.4 h | 105.4 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 9,500 mAh | 6,580 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 16 | 52 |
| Drop reliability class | E | E |
| Repairability index | 3.89/5 | 3.37/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 7 years | 6 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP42 | IP20 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 20 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | — |
| Model numbers | CTITANULTRAX | Pad 13 Pro |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.