BIRDCLAW P7S-B vs Oukitel RT9 (EPREL 2414479)
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: BIRDCLAW P7S-B 67/100, Oukitel RT9 (EPREL 2414479) 67/100.
| BIRDCLAW P7S-B | Oukitel RT9 (EPREL 2414479) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | F | B |
| Durability score | 67/100 | 67/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 120.7 h | 302.2 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 12,000 mAh | 11,000 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 52 | 208 |
| Drop reliability class | E | A |
| Repairability index | 3.38/5 | 3.15/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 6 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP20 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 18 W | 18 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | P12 Pro | RT9 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.