BIRDCLAW P7S-B vs Hotwav TAB R9 Pro Max
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: BIRDCLAW P7S-B 67/100, Hotwav TAB R9 Pro Max 68/100.
| BIRDCLAW P7S-B | Hotwav TAB R9 Pro Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | F | C |
| Durability score | 67/100 | 68/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 120.7 h | 413.4 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 12,000 mAh | 20,080 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 52 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | E | B |
| Repairability index | 3.38/5 | 3.33/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 6 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP20 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 18 W | 20 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | P12 Pro | TAB R9 Pro Max |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.