Beko WTA 8612 XSWR 7161143200 vs Hoover H3W 48BL11H-S
The Hoover H3W 48BL11H-S uses 84 kWh less a year, about €24 a year at the EU average price.
| Beko WTA 8612 XSWR 7161143200 | Hoover H3W 48BL11H-S | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | C | A |
| Annual consumption | 136.4 kWh | 52.8 kWh |
| Running cost (EU avg.) | €39/year | €15/year |
| Capacity | 8 kg | 8 kg |
| Energy per 100 cycles | 62 kWh | 24 kWh |
| Water per cycle | 41 L | 42 L |
| Spin noise | 74 dB(A) | 72 dB(A) |
| Noise class | B | A |
| Max. spin speed | 1,200 rpm | 1,330 rpm |
| Spin-drying class | B | B |
| Eco 40-60 programme | 218 min | 218 min |
| Remaining moisture | 53% | 53.9% |
| Height | 84 cm | 85 cm |
| Width | 60 cm | 60 cm |
| Depth | 59 cm | 56 cm |
| Model numbers | WTA 8612 XSWR 7161143200, WMY 81283 LMB4R 7161143300, WTK82011W 7178682100, WTL82051W 7178682200 | H3W 48BL11H-S, H3W 48L11H-S |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.