Anyreal P5C-AR vs Doogee VPad Pro
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 0 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Anyreal P5C-AR 65/100, Doogee VPad Pro 65/100.
| Anyreal P5C-AR | Doogee VPad Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | G | G |
| Durability score | 65/100 | 65/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 77.7 h | 77.7 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,100 charge cycles | 1,100 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 11,000 mAh | 11,000 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 52 | 52 |
| Drop reliability class | E | E |
| Repairability index | 3.42/5 | 3.42/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 6 years | 6 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP20 | IP20 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 6 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 20 W | 20 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | U13 | U13 Pro |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.