AKPO WK-4 NEVA ECO60/T22/C04/L06/FA4 vs Aurakich AUR-RHB08-EU
The Aurakich AUR-RHB08-EU uses 44 kWh less a year, about €13 a year at the EU average price.
| AKPO WK-4 NEVA ECO60/T22/C04/L06/FA4 | Aurakich AUR-RHB08-EU | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | C | A+++ |
| Annual consumption | 51 kWh | 6.8 kWh |
| Running cost (EU avg.) | €14/year | €2/year |
| Energy consumption | 51 kWh/year | 6.8 kWh/year |
| Max. airflow | 474 m³/h | 480 m³/h |
| Min. airflow | 147 m³/h | 219 m³/h |
| Boost airflow | — | 686 m³/h |
| Noise at max. | 71 dB(A) | 61 dB(A) |
| Noise at min. | 44 dB(A) | 39 dB(A) |
| Noise at boost | — | 61 dB(A) |
| Fluid dynamic efficiency | D | A |
| Grease filtering class | E | D |
| Grease filtering | 63% | 65.3% |
| Lighting efficiency | A | A |
| Model numbers | WK-4 NEVA ECO60/T22/C04/L06/FA4, WK-4 TIGRA60/T22/C04/L06/FA4, WK-4 NEVA60/T22/C04/L06/FA4 | AUR-RHB08-EU |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.